Revisiting Survivor Themes: What worked and what didn’t for Survivor: All-Stars

LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 09: Rupert Boneham arrives at the CBS "Survivor" 10 Year Anniversary Party on January 9, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Jason Merritt/Getty Images)
LOS ANGELES, CA - JANUARY 09: Rupert Boneham arrives at the CBS "Survivor" 10 Year Anniversary Party on January 9, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Jason Merritt/Getty Images) /

Survivor 41 is reportedly set to be the dawn of a new era. Not only is the show seemingly running with a shorter game on the island, but production is also doing away with season themes.

Since the show’s sixth season, several seasons have used a central theme to help set the stage for the game. With that about to go away, we wanted to take a look back at the many themes that Survivor has used over the years and see what worked, what didn’t, and how it helped shape the franchise.

What did Survivor: All-Stars get right?

Survivor: All-Stars took things to the next level in terms of theme. The Amazon explored what would happen if the tribes were split by gender, which was successful in the narrative but didn’t really shape the game. Then, Pearl Islands mostly took things back to basics. All-Stars, on the other hand, took the game in a completely new direction by bringing back 18 of the biggest fan favorites to play the game again.

This has obviously become something the show loves to go back to. Whether it’s full returners seasons like Heroes vs. Villains or just a few like in Guatemala, it’s something that’s become a staple of Survivor.

When looking at how it impacted the actual season of All-Stars, it’s very obvious that the theme made a massive impact on the players. These were the best of the best at the time and living up to that billing was something everyone wanted to do.

The gameplay was cutthroat. Winners and strategic players from past seasons were targeted immediately, as the other players wanted to prove they deserved that spot. It led to hurt feelings all around as gameplay trumped personal feelings.

Consider how burnt so many players felt at the end of the season by Rob Mariano. Out of everyone, he was the most willing to take the game by the horns and show fans what truly cutthroat gameplay could like like. It was messy but effective. And without a season filled with returners, Survivor might’ve never made that next jump. These players had played before. It was no longer about “the experience.” This was the ultimate business trip.

For some, that’s the beginning of the show falling off as the social experiment gave way to the game. However, it’s impossible to deny that this season was a flashpoint for what Survivor would become.

What did Survivor: All-Stars get wrong?

Of course, many players on the season might say the theme wasn’t a success for them personally. That pressure of living up to the billing of “All-Star” hurt a lot of people mentally. If that didn’t get them, then the gameplay being so cutthroat surely did. Unlike so many other seasons of Survivor, All-Stars seemed much less fun. There were laughs, for sure, but everything just felt different.

That said, All-Stars might be the most successful theme Survivor has ever had when considering what’s come next. Production doesn’t go back to other themes with the regularity we see returners seasons. Sure, we’ve had two Blood vs. Water-style seasons and a few Brains vs. Beauties vs. Brawns, but most themes are one-and-done. All-Stars is something we see almost every other season.

Next. Survivor season 41: Way too early contestant power rankings for Survivor 41. dark